WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "19cd795d-e9b2-4597-beca-092ec2e9d4f4"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 1, "id": "8265", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "8265"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:shiga-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008265", "sets": ["871"]}, "author_link": ["30974", "30972", "30973"], "item_2_alternative_title_20": {"attribute_name": "タイトル(ヨミ)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "カヘイロン ノ テイキ スル ホウホウロンテキ モンダイ オ メグッテ"}]}, "item_2_alternative_title_22": {"attribute_name": "その他の言語のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "On Methodology of Money Theory"}]}, "item_2_biblio_info_8": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2012-12", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "第394号", "bibliographicPageEnd": "173", "bibliographicPageStart": "160", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "彦根論叢"}]}]}, "item_2_description_43": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Departmental Bulletin Paper", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_2_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Today, movements of global money often disturb the world economy. That means “what’s money?” becomes the critical issue to understand the economic situation in our times. But standard economics does not take up this kind of question. On the contrary, heretical economic theories have sometimes shown attractive approaches to this question. One such approach was Marx’s money theory; but it had a defect. To solve this problem, two types of approach have been proposed. On the one hand, Kohzoh Uno proposed a methodological device which was relatively close to Marx’s original theory. On the other, Michel\nAglietta, Andre Orlean, Hidenari Yoshizawa, Kohjin Karatani and others proposed a socioeconomic approach connected with modern philosophical thought, namely structuralism and social constructionism. These two approaches seem radically different, but I think Uno’s methodological device has potential adaptability when fully developing it’s connotation.\nThis paper attempts to fully develop the connotation of Uno’s methodological device and\nto confirm whether there is a relatively close relationship between the two approaches to\novercome the defect of Marx’s money theory.\nIn other words, this paper considers money theory to confirm whether Uno’s methodological device has a relatively close relationship with modern philosophical thought.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_2_description_7": {"attribute_name": "引用", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "彦根論叢, 第394号, pp. 160-173", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "The Hikone Ronso, No.394, pp. 160-173", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_2_full_name_2": {"attribute_name": "著者(ヨミ)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "30973", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "ウメザワ, ナオキ"}]}]}, "item_2_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "30974", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Umezawa, Naoki"}]}]}, "item_2_publisher_35": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "滋賀大学経済学会"}]}, "item_2_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00207196", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_2_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0387-5989", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "梅澤, 直樹"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "30972", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-09-13"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "梅澤直樹.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "3.9 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 3900000.0, "url": {"label": "梅澤直樹.pdf", "url": "https://shiga-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/8265/files/梅澤直樹.pdf"}, "version_id": "ec45c40e-fea8-4732-8b2d-2ef79aa54106"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "貨幣論の提起する方法論的問題をめぐって", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "貨幣論の提起する方法論的問題をめぐって"}]}, "item_type_id": "2", "owner": "1", "path": ["871"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10441/11142", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2013-01-21"}, "publish_date": "2013-01-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "8265", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["貨幣論の提起する方法論的問題をめぐって"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
貨幣論の提起する方法論的問題をめぐって
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/11142
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/111427b90fd4b-da79-4156-8111-7454f9b1163e
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
梅澤直樹.pdf (3.9 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2013-01-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 貨幣論の提起する方法論的問題をめぐって | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
梅澤, 直樹
× 梅澤, 直樹 |
|||||
著者(ヨミ) | ||||||
姓名 | ウメザワ, ナオキ | |||||
著者別名 | ||||||
姓名 | Umezawa, Naoki | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Today, movements of global money often disturb the world economy. That means “what’s money?” becomes the critical issue to understand the economic situation in our times. But standard economics does not take up this kind of question. On the contrary, heretical economic theories have sometimes shown attractive approaches to this question. One such approach was Marx’s money theory; but it had a defect. To solve this problem, two types of approach have been proposed. On the one hand, Kohzoh Uno proposed a methodological device which was relatively close to Marx’s original theory. On the other, Michel Aglietta, Andre Orlean, Hidenari Yoshizawa, Kohjin Karatani and others proposed a socioeconomic approach connected with modern philosophical thought, namely structuralism and social constructionism. These two approaches seem radically different, but I think Uno’s methodological device has potential adaptability when fully developing it’s connotation. This paper attempts to fully develop the connotation of Uno’s methodological device and to confirm whether there is a relatively close relationship between the two approaches to overcome the defect of Marx’s money theory. In other words, this paper considers money theory to confirm whether Uno’s methodological device has a relatively close relationship with modern philosophical thought. |
|||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 彦根論叢, 第394号, pp. 160-173 | |||||
引用 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The Hikone Ronso, No.394, pp. 160-173 | |||||
書誌情報 |
彦根論叢 号 第394号, p. 160-173, 発行日 2012-12 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0387-5989 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00207196 | |||||
タイトル(ヨミ) | ||||||
その他のタイトル | カヘイロン ノ テイキ スル ホウホウロンテキ モンダイ オ メグッテ | |||||
その他の言語のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | On Methodology of Money Theory | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 滋賀大学経済学会 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Departmental Bulletin Paper |