WEKO3
アイテム
Liverpool Merchants versus Ohmi Merchants:How and Why They Dealt with Risk and Insurance Differently
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/14803
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/1480315470a69-1557-47af-abac-f48b5c0a9501
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
DPA19_p.1-25酒井泰弘.pdf (522.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | テクニカルレポート / Technical Report(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-07-22 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Liverpool Merchants versus Ohmi Merchants:How and Why They Dealt with Risk and Insurance Differently | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Liverpool merchants | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Ohmi merchants | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | risk | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | insurance | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | triangular trade | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||||
| 著者 |
Sakai, Yasuhiro
× Sakai, Yasuhiro
|
|||||||
| 著者(ヨミ) | ||||||||
| 姓名 | サカイ, ヤスヒロ | |||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 姓名 | 酒井, 泰弘 | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to intensively discuss and carefully compare the Liverpool Merchants of Britain and the Ohmi merchants of Japan in a historical perspective. The question of much interest is how and why those two merchants dealt with risk and insurance differently. In his later years, J.R. Hicks did a great contribution on the theory of economic history. He paid a special attention to the rise of the market in which the merchant played as the main actor of the history theater. According to the Hicks doctrine, the relation between theory and history should not be one-to-one, but rather flexible to a certain degree. Therefore, it would be quite interesting to compare the Liverpool merchants of Britain and the Ohmi merchants of Japan. It will be seen that they were engaged in their respective triangular trade, producing their respective socioeconomic systems. In short, we have to take a pluralistic view in order to fully understand the concept of risk and insurance from the viewpoint of economic history. |
|||||||
| 引用 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | CRR Discussion Paper, Series A, No. A-19, pp. 1-25 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
CRR Discussion Paper, Series A 号 No. A-19, p. 1-25, 発行日 2016-07 |
|||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | Center for Risk Research (CRR), Shiga University | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Technical Report | |||||||
