WEKO3
アイテム
The Effects of Habitual Grammatical Past : A Contrastive Study
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/0002000137
http://hdl.handle.net/10441/0002000137b4a0a7d0-051a-453f-b6df-0338aabef55a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hikoron437_pp.34-45_Nose.pdf (791 KB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-02-26 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Effects of Habitual Grammatical Past : A Contrastive Study | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
野瀬, 昌彦
× 野瀬, 昌彦
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This study attempts to clarify the usages of the habitual past forms cross-linguistically. Remarkably, this study contrasts the languages with grammatical habitual and those without it. The sample languages are genealogically and typologically different, including two Trans-New Guinea languages, Amele and Ma Manda, spoken in Papua New Guinea. Amele and Ma Manda have habitual grammatical past, as in (1). (1) Grammatical habitual: a. Amele: Ija (I) ho-l-ig (come-habitual past- 1sg). “I used to come.” b. Ma Manda: kodup (betel nut) na-waagotnang (eat-perfective/1sg-habitual). “I used to chew betel nut.” (Pennington, 2015: 408) In (1a), Amele has the habitual element “l” inside the verbal inflections, and the verbal form indicates habitual past meaning. Ma Manda has the habitual suffix “-nang”in the verb and the suffix indicates habitual aspect, as in (1b). On the other hand, the habitual past can be realized lexically in other sample languages, such as English and Hungarian, as in (2). (2) Lexical habitual: a. English: I used to dance here. b. Hungarian: En angolul szok-t-am (used topast-1sg) tanulni. “I used to study English.” The habitual past tense describes an event that has occurred continuously in past time, and this study discusses how grammar recognizes the habitual event. In (2a-b), English and Hungarian use lexical verbs (used to/szokni) as habitual. By contrasting the sample languages, this study analyzes the semantic mechanism of the habitual past actions (cf. Carlson 2012). The habitual meaning can be lexical in Hungarian or less grammaticalized in English, and their habitual meaning is still included in verb forms of both languages. Therefore, the lexical habitual. In contrast, Amele and Ma Manda have more grammaticalized forms (infix or suffix), and their habitual forms are independent of their verb meanings. Bybee et al. (1994) deal with tense/aspect categories in terms of grammaticalization, and it is considered that the languages with grammatical habitual are more incorporated into tense/aspect categories (cf. Elliott 2000). Thus, the effect of habitual grammatical means that habitual action can be interpreted in the past tense or aspectuality. Finally, this study claims that habitual actions can be realized lexically or grammatically, and each language’s choice is functionally motivated. Notably, the Trans-New Guinea languages, such as Amele and Ma Manda, prefer habitual grammatical forms, and the languages have effects of taking in the repeated past actions in their grammar at the cost of more complicated verb morphology. |
|||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 引用 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 彦根論叢, 第437号, pp. 34-45 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 彦根論叢 en : The Hikone Ronso 号 第437号, p. 34-45, ページ数 12, 発行日 2023-10-31 |
|||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-5989 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1208814X | |||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 滋賀大学 経済学会 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
